Andrew Huberman· PhD
The less of your own personal practice, and understanding, and knowledge you've done, the more toys you need. The more you've really worked on yourself, the more high-tech you are. The more low-tech are your
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The less of your own personal practice, and understanding, and knowledge you've done, the more toys you need. The more you've really worked on yourself, the more high-tech you are. The more low-tech are your
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
loved the example of moving through the crowded street with a backpack because of the way in which it's completely adaptive to the situation you happened to be in and highlights the fact that one doesn't need a gym or any specific scenario
The less of your own personal practice, and understanding, and knowledge you've done, the more toys you need. The more you've really worked on yourself, the more high-tech you are. The more low-tech are your tools, the more high-tech you are.