The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but running is number one now it depends on when you want to play absolute or relative games here in terms of injury rate but why a ton of people do it they're unprepared for it and they jump way up yeah and mileage so if you want to reduce injury risk oh I see they they violate that 10% they violate it all right they jump in they don't do it well they're not prepared for it boom foot knee back and they run mileage on very little progression
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.