We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
doing five minutes on five minutes off for example will not necessarily yield the maximum work that you can do at that because we're not looking at total work during the session because obviously that would be better if you brought down the intensity toal but now you're looking for this specific you want to increase the maximum oxygen output so we not looking at something that sits in this range there there high intensity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.