Peter Attia· MD
80 percent of running injuries are what he would call training or originally a result of what he would call training errors
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
80 percent of running injuries are what he would call training or originally a result of what he would call training errors
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
look eighty percent of running injuries are what he would call training or originally a a result of what he would call training errors so yeah it's nice you know there's 20 percent to work with on you know shoes or whatever you know if prehabilitation and balance yada yada most of most of what we need to worry about is doing too much too soon
80% of running injuries are what he would call training are originally a result of what he would call training errors so yeah it's it's nice you know there's 20% to work with on you know shoes or whatever you know prehabilitation and balance y y y most of most of what we need to worry about is doing too much too soon