The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
where you say okay there's there's a fuel and an energy input so you look at oxygen consumption for example because this you can do with a car even with a car and then you look at okay you have power so most people will probably have a power meter but if they are cycling and a little bit more if you don't have it does really is not that important because anyway the the the output from this process will be distance per time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.