The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I could see where that could have tremendous value. Whether everyone needs that, I don't know, you know, whether you can use heart rate and some other metrics to at least get you reasonably into some zones. But I can see why there would be tremendous interest in...among athletes to monitor that and really dial it in to get an idea of their metabolic stress.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.