The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
number one you have to move wellish is how I'll phrase it you don't have to be perfect but you have to move wellish this is your Technique comment of like don't overstress but also be mindful that there is some remember the joints are supposed to go through their full range of motion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it needs to be put through its range of motion so one of the challenges we want to look at in your gym in your workout is are you actually stressing it over all of this range of motions are only stressing in a one mhm that's going to be a recipe for injury because you are going to overuse on one side of it and now you've got the analogy what we've used for decades now is you can imagine a car with four tires and the alignment is slightly off yeah wear and tear right great so alignment is everything as a starting place it's not the only thing and you can get away with bad alignment for sure when can you not get away with bad alignment when the volume gets ratcheted up so that's the second thing you're paying attention to if you're at a low volume then a little bit of asymmetry doesn't matter a lot of asymmetry will not matter as you ratchet up volume now the exposure starts to really become an issue so what do you do move well and be judicious with your volume