you know these are these people were technically so Superior that you know I could put I could consume five lers of oxygen they would consume three no comparison
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know these are these people were technically so Superior that you know I could put I could consume five lers of oxygen they would consume three no comparison
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because he's so efficient he actually swim at the same velocity with almost 25% less oxygen consumption than the best Tri in the world is doing and that is a a little bit of little bit mindboggling but it just tells how important also efficiency or movement efficiency is into this whole equation as well
I came to swimming late in life I'm an adult onset swimmer so I didn't swim until I was 31 years old this is almost 20 years ago and it never ceased to amaze me even when I was at my absolute fittest on the bike when I when my V2 Max was more than 5 L how people with seemingly such a lack of Fitness could destroy me in a swimming pool