The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
just so folks understand while those two things are moving up in a curval linear relationship the velocity relationship is actually a squared or a power relationship ship and therefore it gets harder and harder when you're talking about athletes at the level that you're coaching to eek out an additional kilometer per hour when they're already going 48 kilm per hour it becomes seismic to try to add 5% to that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the velocity relationship is actually a squared or a power relationship ship and therefore it gets harder and harder when you're talking about athletes at the level that you're coaching to eek out an additional kilometer per hour when they're already going 48 kilm per hour it becomes seismic to try to add 5% to that