The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I'm seeing now why the assault bike is such a powerful tool because you're using your arms with some degree of resistance but not a lot of Ecentric load plus legs some resistance not a lot of Ecentric load and yet one can go quote unquote all out for 30 to 60 seconds yep and and the consequence es of a technical breakdown are minimal it's more like you're going to actually have a worse performance rather than an injury rate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But we're big assault bike aerodyine people because it's just the I think it's the most efficient way to to hit your cardiovascular system with what I would call no orthopedic cost. Like I can kill you on the bike and nothing bad is going to happen.