The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the numbers I'm trying to remember this is back 30 years what the numbers were it would be something like in the fast fibers would be something like 10 to 12 mil equivalents in the blood it would be four and in the red fibers it would be three and then in the arterial and then that but the four was in Venus blood correct in blood no that would be arterial that was an arterial blood got it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.