Andrew Huberman· PhD
But the thing that I think is effective there, is that tends to be one of the ones that people like the most. Because they can go in, they get their pump, they feel good. It's pretty solely focused on one muscle group.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But the thing that I think is effective there, is that tends to be one of the ones that people like the most. Because they can go in, they get their pump, they feel good. It's pretty solely focused on one muscle group.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And again, you can go back to the bro-split days, and those still work effectively. There's a reason why they worked in the past. I think that science shows that there's smarter ways to do them these days.
Probably more aesthetics than strength, yeah.