Andrew Huberman· PhD
But in general, when you're not focused on that one aspect, but the overall health picture, then you can get the job done in under an hour.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But in general, when you're not focused on that one aspect, but the overall health picture, then you can get the job done in under an hour.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if people ask you know what is the you know amount of time it takes to get in a really good workout it's going to be about an hour you know but a lot can be done in 45 or even 30 minutes
If we try to keep our workouts to an hour or less, if possible, now depending upon the split that you're following, if you're on a total body split, there's just going to be more that has to be done in a given amount of time. But in general, when you're not focused on that one aspect, but the overall health picture, then you can get the job done in in under in under an hour.