The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
why five minut well why did you land on five minut well could it also be four for example could be three could be two because what we're really looking at here is how the maximum but but we want to make sure we don't make the interval too small that we're getting we're quote unquote cheating and using pure glycolytic power which obviously has its benefits but won't necessarily increase presumably at some level mitochondrial function and mitochondrial throughput
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the classic thinking classic cycling physiology is maximizing V2 Max and maximizing pvo2 max power at V2 Max critical power for example is going to be attained at 3 to 8 Minute intervals now it doesn't mean you don't improve the engine size when you're doing intervals Less Than 3 minutes or more than 8 minutes