there have been Runners who have won marathons with a heel strike that's at their Center of mass they just have more knee flexion for example
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there have been Runners who have won marathons with a heel strike that's at their Center of mass they just have more knee flexion for example
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we want the foot to strike as close to the center of mass as possible
when you look at Cadence and you look at um you know I call them running fairies because it just looks like they can run forever their foot will be close to their Center of mass and it is more likely that they will be at a midfoot and four foot strike when their foot is underneath them
There have been runners who have won marathons with a heel strike that's at their center of mass. They just have more knee flexion.