Andrew Huberman· PhD
We see the problems occurring because in order to get normal mechanics and free up the joint maximally inside you need to externally rotate as you raise the arm up.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We see the problems occurring because in order to get normal mechanics and free up the joint maximally inside you need to externally rotate as you raise the arm up.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And if we do that from an internally rotated position, we're going to have a higher likelihood of creating stress inside that joint.
And if we do that from an internally rotated position, we're going to have a higher likelihood of creating stress inside that joint.