Peter Attia· MD
so landing on your heel versus your foot does not change the peak force the peak force is the same it changes that first impact you remove that impact
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so landing on your heel versus your foot does not change the peak force the peak force is the same it changes that first impact you remove that impact
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a rearfoot striker has an impact peak followed by a propulsive peak this impact peak is a very quick rise to peak
and so this impact peak is associated with a very quick application of force to the body called the load rate