Andrew Huberman· PhD
The one caveat is that Stu Mill himself has told me that he doesn't want the big three to be viewed as the Beall end all of back strengthening and Pain Relief by no means is it exhaustive to do just the big three
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The one caveat is that Stu Mill himself has told me that he doesn't want the big three to be viewed as the Beall end all of back strengthening and Pain Relief by no means is it exhaustive to do just the big three
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.