Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
I do think that let me actually bring it back just a step further it we don't really know that much on the half life in this regard because of course it's not acute and only in that moment it could be that it's still part of the ongoing process how how much did I have asymptomatic issues that were still being worked on by my body a couple days later we can't say
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.