Peter Attia· MD
for example most of my patients are absolutely not measuring their lactate levels during their cardio training it if 2% or 5% are that would probably be accurate
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for example most of my patients are absolutely not measuring their lactate levels during their cardio training it if 2% or 5% are that would probably be accurate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for example most of my patients are absolutely not measuring their lactate levels during their cardio training it if if 2% or 5% are that would probably be accurate and for most people it's what you say it's what do I need to do to make you enjoy this and use your rate of perceived exertion as the guide tool