Andrew Huberman· PhD
But I got through, from the time I broke it, I did another 85 skydives on it. Went through Utah, I mean, up and, up and down that crazy elevation, just really just sucking it up, but it was a test for mental resiliency.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But I got through, from the time I broke it, I did another 85 skydives on it. Went through Utah, I mean, up and, up and down that crazy elevation, just really just sucking it up, but it was a test for mental resiliency.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.