The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
females actually have a greater percentage of type one muscle fibers than do males um and the positive consequence of that um difference there for females is that it means that we're better able to transport nutrients uh into the tissues and also clear um different metabolites um you know during activi so the benefit there is that women tend to be less fatigable um when it comes to training
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
females actually have a greater percentage of type 1 muscle fibers than do males and the positive consequence of that um difference there for females is that it means that we're better able to transport nutrients into the tissues and also clear different metabolites um you know during activities so the benefit there is that women tend to be less fatigable um when it comes to training
women um again in either both the fed and the fasted State tend to do better at utilizing um fatty acids so again it means that we're less Reliant upon some of those glycolytic um you know Pathways or anaerobic processes so um we do better um in as when it comes to recovery from different types of training