Peter Attia· MD
So we see it very well. Others have done it before with muscle biopsies where they have shown that feeder individuals, they can store more glycogen than other individuals. And that's what we see.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So we see it very well. Others have done it before with muscle biopsies where they have shown that feeder individuals, they can store more glycogen than other individuals. And that's what we see.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the well-trained athlete, they really increase it as well.
It's an irony because the fitter you are and the more glycogen you store, the less you are dependent on it.