The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So it was, you know. Certainly, Dr. Gibala: I think, you know, it's like a lot of things with interval training, you can pick your study to argue one side or the other, but, you know, I think that, and of course, meta-analyses are based on all of these studies, some good, some less good, but I think that's the sort of the state of the field is it's probably not a big deal for most people, including if, look, I got half an hour today, I can do both.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.