Andrew Huberman· PhD
For me, the first rule is will you stick to it? Like if you, 'cause there are split, I don't particularly like full body splits.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
For me, the first rule is will you stick to it? Like if you, 'cause there are split, I don't particularly like full body splits.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So you need to find one that fits.
for me, the first rule is will you stick to it? I don't particularly like full body splits. I don't necessarily like to have to train everything. Now, of course, the volumes will come down per muscle group. But if you don't like to do that and you actually don't look forward to your workout because you're dreading having to do everything and feeling maybe too fatigued by the time your workout's over or the fact that those generally do take a little bit longer and don't fit into your schedule, I don't care how effective the split is. A split not done is not effective. So, you need to find one that fits.