I think it can be more um accurate um but yeah the MRI I just I rarely will order that just because it doesn't really give me the information that I'm looking for
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think it can be more um accurate um but yeah the MRI I just I rarely will order that just because it doesn't really give me the information that I'm looking for
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at research on doing MRIs for example for tendonopathy that in Achilles it really doesn't give you all that much information that's valuable because you can see a tendon on an image and it'll be like wow what's going on here and it doesn't correlate with subjective or even