Bryan Johnson· Author
we're trying to move on to better stuff and now we're trying exosomes this is mixed up so we're going to use a 1927 laser open up the channels for the drug delivery and then deliver the exosomes
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we're trying to move on to better stuff and now we're trying exosomes this is mixed up so we're going to use a 1927 laser open up the channels for the drug delivery and then deliver the exosomes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
uh we're doing this instead of PRP so it's less invasive and hopefully more effective
we also have exosomes for the hair so we're going to use a 1927 nanm laser same thing is drug assisted laser for the hair