The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we did have someone who did a steak only challenge a couple years ago and they were drinking coffee during that time and their triglycerides exploded super high I think it was above 300 even and we 500 okay so it was 500 and we actually had them retested to see if they could replicate it so they were eating the exact same thing as before all that type of stuff including the coffee and it didn't happen
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the commonality was is they were habitual coffee drinkers and to clarify this doesn't happen to everyone so it doesn't happen to me I drink coffee my intrigues are below 100 all good but for a minority of people especially carnivores it seems if they are habitual coffee drinkers that will cause this high triglyceride effect
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.