Andrew Huberman· PhD
so that begs the question that in the maybe tin high will do this experiment again to combine nutrition advice with time restriction and maybe reduce the time to 10 hours and that might help
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so that begs the question that in the maybe tin high will do this experiment again to combine nutrition advice with time restriction and maybe reduce the time to 10 hours and that might help
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and people who were in time frustrating the eight within 12 hours they did not change the nutrition quality but what is interesting is they both got the same modest weight loss
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.