Andrew Huberman· PhD
can we conclude for humans that whether or not a feeding window is four hours six hours eight hours or 12 doesn't matter provided that calories are are similar or same
Loading…
Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
can we conclude for humans that whether or not a feeding window is four hours six hours eight hours or 12 doesn't matter provided that calories are are similar or same
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Despite the claims it is NOT clear to me that IF or TRF increases longevity in humans.
and maybe how much is when you're fasted that's still i think is an open question
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.