Andrew Huberman· PhD
Interesting study in @CellRepMed showing positive effects of time restricted feeding on multiple variables (see image), especially when combined with low carbohydrate intake.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Interesting study in @CellRepMed showing positive effects of time restricted feeding on multiple variables (see image), especially when combined with low carbohydrate intake.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as I recall the um the greatest weight loss remember same calories across groups folks was achieved with low carbohydrate plus caloric restriction
and maybe carbohydrate restriction in conjunction with time restricted feeding might be the best path for people who are looking to lose weight
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.