so they both experience both intermittent hypoxia and intermittent fasting and you know to a great degree this is what turns down in tor and turns out the top of you
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so they both experience both intermittent hypoxia and intermittent fasting and you know to a great degree this is what turns down in tor and turns out the top of you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you know was turning off and turning on and talking via intermittent hypoxia part of you know their secret we don't we don't know and it's unlikely anyone's going to do those experiments because of how negative you know the attitude is towards smoking and again I'm not uncertainly not recommending that people do this it's just interesting that it's another way of turning on Tov G another way of repairing and clearing out bad things from your cells which is noted in both long long-lived species of bowhead whales which live up to 250 years of age and they're a mammal and naked mole-rats so they both experience both intermittent hypoxia and intermittent fasting
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.