Andrew Huberman· PhD
No difference in body fat reduction between groups by the end of the study, whether they did their cardio fed, or whether they did it fasted. And that's because we equated the total nutrition between the groups.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
No difference in body fat reduction between groups by the end of the study, whether they did their cardio fed, or whether they did it fasted. And that's because we equated the total nutrition between the groups.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
especially if it was done fasted because remember if you're doing it fasted you've got the added benefit of depleted glycogen to begin with and then you add this insulin sensitivity stimulus and so you've got and the utilization of muscle glycogen
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.