There is no significant difference in metabolic outcomes between eating 3000 calories over 12 hours versus eating 3000 calories over 6 hours.

“if you take all the food all the calories that you're going to eat and eat them in a sixh hour window versus a 12-hour window totally same amount of calories exact same food this is a controlled experiment people who eat the”

“if you're spacing that food out over the course of 12 hours that is a different biochemical millu in your body throughout the day it's kind of similar to The Walking you know it's like you are then stimulating insulin several more times you are exposing the bloodstream to insulin and glucose just more throughout the day um and giving the bloodstream less of an opportunity to sort of be clear from that glucose and that insulin”

“if we reasonably compress our eating into daytime hours during the heart of the dial cycle when we are supposed to be eating so essentially matching our chronobiology with our Behavior which you know we are dial organism so we kind of need to respect that like when we do that and we compress it in a moderate way our metabolic health is better”

“if you take all the food all the calories that you're going to eat and eat them in a sixh hour window versus a 12-hour window totally same amount of calories exact same food this is a controlled experiment people who eat the same amount of calories in a six-hour period are going to have much lower statistically significantly lower glucose uh 24-hour glucose and insulin levels compared to people who just space it out over the course of a 12-hour period”

“was there something magical about not eating so if you had an experiment that was done where people are going to eat 3 000 calories a day spread out over the course of 12 hours versus people that are going to eat 3 000 calories spread out over 6 hours is there any difference between them and i think the answer today is no”