The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they showed without question that they could not cause liver damage we all know have fundamental liver is so this is a great indicator they could not cause liver damage in the rash when it was on beef tallow when it was on three or four percent linoleic with the pork fats and some added linoleic I think they got very dramatic liver damage with the same amount of alcohol and the sunflower was just off the scale
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
not even that it makes it worse but you require above 1% to even get liver damage from alcohol
dietary linoleic acid is required for development of experimental induced alcoholic liver injury