The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Because visceral fat is surrounding liver. You're getting a lot of free fatty acids and they're going right to the liver. So the liver has to store it, right? So you get this non-alcoholic, you know, fatty fatty liver, but and that happened after 5 days.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and I think that that's probably a huge factor in why again not the only factor but I think that's probably a huge factor and why the metabolic health of someone who has relatively more visceral fat is so much worse than the person who has relatively more subcutaneous fat is because you're basically pounding the liver fat all the time
and the visceral fat pad directly empties into the portal vein and so is a huge factor in fat in compared to the subcutaneous fat pad