The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So in some of our studies we kind of exaggerate. We go vegan even though we're not expecting the world to go vegan. We just want them to eat more plants. We went to six servings because they were eating a half a serving before. And to just say why don't you double that to one? It's like, okay, we're not going to get a a perturbation of metabolism with one. Let's go to six.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.