Andrew Huberman· PhD
Cannabis is detrimental to sperm: even if they can fertilize, there can be DNA damage.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Cannabis is detrimental to sperm: even if they can fertilize, there can be DNA damage.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the degree that female partners who conceive from a male partner who's using cannabis have much higher miscarriage rates than partners who do not utilize cannabis.
All cannabis use is hugely detrimental to sperm for sure across the board, right? both production, the quantity of sperm, uh testosterone production, also the quality of the sperm, specifically the DNA fragmentation inside the head of the sperm to the degree that female partners who conceive from a male partner who's using cannabis have much higher miscarriage rates than partners who do not utilize cannabis.