Paul Saladino· MD
then there is this topic of calcification of the pineal gland and i was honestly a little skeptical of this when i first read about it but as i read more about it it actually is
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
then there is this topic of calcification of the pineal gland and i was honestly a little skeptical of this when i first read about it but as i read more about it it actually is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so basically the author goes on to say that fluoride does not accumulate in the brain of all tissues the brain has the lowest fluoride concentration generally agree that the blood-brain barrier restricts the passage of fluoride into the central nervous system but the human pineal gland is outside the blood-brain barrier it is one of the few unique regions of the brain where the blood-brain barrier is weak cells in these regions require direct and unimpeded contact with the blood therefore pineal oh sites have free access to fluoride in the bloodstream
This fact coupled with the presence of ha which is hydroxyapatite calcium hydroxyapatite or fluoride hydroxyapatite suggested the pineal gland may sequester fluoride from the bloodstream you can see up here in the abstract they did look at pineal calcium and pineal fluoride and compare this to bones and their conclusion was that there was a positive correlation between pineal fluoride and pineal calcium but no correlation between pineal fluoride and bone fluoride by old age the pineal gland has readily accumulated fluoride and its fluoride calcium ratio is higher than bone
this is the micrograms of fluoride per 100 micrograms of calcium the calcium content of bone is determined by stoichiometry if you guys are just listening to this you can see that the pineal hydroxyapatite has much higher levels of fluoride than bone right so fluoride is accumulating in the pineal preferentially perhaps is the right word more than bone and more and other tissues the body