Andrew Huberman· PhD
however it is no match for a poor diet you know so all of this really comes back to what you're eating so it will make you less at risk for cavities but it's it's not a shoe in like it's not for sure going to prevent Decay
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
however it is no match for a poor diet you know so all of this really comes back to what you're eating so it will make you less at risk for cavities but it's it's not a shoe in like it's not for sure going to prevent Decay
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.