The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then earlier you said something and I've never thought about this the bones contain hydroxy appetite 60% I think you said 60% your bone minerals are made from hydroxy appetite fluoride infiltrates the minerals of the teeth and replaces it so is fluoride going into our bones skeletal fosis okay
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The bones contain hydroxy appetite 60% I think you said 60% your bone minerals are made from hydroxy appetite fluoride infiltrates the minerals of the teeth and replaces it so is fluoride going into our bones skeletal fosis