Andrew Huberman· PhD
so now it's most likely still a topical benefit maybe a little bit of a systemic benefit touching the teeth um and we do know fluid really needs to work topically we don't need to be ingesting it
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so now it's most likely still a topical benefit maybe a little bit of a systemic benefit touching the teeth um and we do know fluid really needs to work topically we don't need to be ingesting it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they used to think systemically it was actually incorporating into the developing teeth and children making the anamal stronger that way but that's been debunked