The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of the more interesting studies i found looked at actually an intervention in which nutrients were given and it looked at the horvath clock which again is cpg methylation island so this study is dietary intervention modifies dna methylation age as assessed by the epigenetic clock
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the results are summarized in this graphic here that when they gave people folic acid and b12 which are nutrients that well b12 only occurs in meat and folic acid could occur in leafy greens but is much more bioavailable in liver and organ meats again the importance feeding organ meats there was decelerated methylation age in females with mthfr 677 c to t
this is a folate analog folic acid plus B12 improving epigenetic age estimated by the Horath epigenetic clock