The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
dietary folate not folic acid that is not occurring in nature it is tetrahydrofolate or methylfolate or adenosil folate come in through the diet okay they end up as tetrahydrofolate there's a series of enzymatic reactions which turn them into 510 methylene tetrahydrofolate that is acted upon by mthfr methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase which needs riboflavin that is b2 and b3 and dha according to this diagram do-cos and hexanoic acid and that makes 5-methylfolate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.