The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the foods the children go after are the same foods that we prefer as adults meat organs if we're acculturated to them and if not we still benefit from again which is why desiccated organs are so valuable and then fruit things that are sweet we generally don't want things that are bitter
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think most kids are not going to fight you if you want to feed them fruit or meat and so there your life's easy that's pretty much what they eat now exactly right the kids are animal-based in and of themselves they just don't eat blueberries and meat and the parents are having aneurysms thinking you need to eat some broccoli or some kale and i don't think that's the way it is