Andrew Huberman· PhD
indeed the point is that starvation is not so good and if you think about why it's working it's reducing gastric the rate of gastric emptying
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
indeed the point is that starvation is not so good and if you think about why it's working it's reducing gastric the rate of gastric emptying
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
all right well it turns out that that's the reason for its side effects the reduction in gastric emptying that's why you get nausea that's why you get vomiting that's why you get pancreatitis and most importantly now gastroparesis your stomach turns to Stone and you can't move any food through your intestine at all and worse yet when you stop the medicine the gastroparesis
the negatives would be slowing down uh gastric emptying well I would say yes and that's exactly what the medication is designed to do