Andrew Huberman· PhD
That is NOT to say there are no risks.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
That is NOT to say there are no risks.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And they have increased risk of bowel obstruction, increased risk of pancreatitis, increased risk of, potentially, thyroid issues, of kidney issues.
So, for example, initially, we were seeing very little data. And then the data started coming in. And, for example, if you're on it for four years, your risk of bowel obstruction goes up by 4 and 1/2 fold. That's by 450%. Or your risk of pancreatitis goes up by 900%.