We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
sulforaphane induces oxidative stress and death by a p53 independent mechanism implication of impaired glutathione recycling so you guys can read this study not a good not a good thing not a good thing not what you want to be happening in your body you do not want to impair glutathione recycling
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as i showed in that study saphorophane and some of these plant compounds while they're activating glutathione signaling actually impair the recycling of glutathione this is clearly a toxic mechanism this is not a good thing for humans