Paul Saladino· MD
methionine levels are lower than glycine levels in the same cuts chuck flank neck plate rib rump 2.46 1.88 2.18 2.06 2.27 from 1.88 to 2.46 is the amount of methionine in these cuts
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
methionine levels are lower than glycine levels in the same cuts chuck flank neck plate rib rump 2.46 1.88 2.18 2.06 2.27 from 1.88 to 2.46 is the amount of methionine in these cuts
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
My friends will cut the fat off the steak or they'll cut the chewy bits off the steak and they don't eat them give those to me those are the pieces that are collagen rich that are higher in glycine we should be eating all of it
get some collagen rich meat from an animal which is going to have much more glycine and much less methionine and don't just rely on super high methionine foods