Andrew Huberman· PhD
You know, 15 years ago if I had said human growth hormone, people would have scoffed and now it's commonly added on when we're not getting the outcome we want.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You know, 15 years ago if I had said human growth hormone, people would have scoffed and now it's commonly added on when we're not getting the outcome we want.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
My partner actually did a study where she put them through the same protocol, so the same medications in a subsequent cycle and the only change was adding human growth hormone and had improved embryo development and maturity effects.
I've used human growth hormone for years and years and years, right? There's not an FDA approval to use HGH for egg quality. Yet, we see that it can improve egg quality in the right patient in the lab.